Windows 7
So I got the opportunity to play around with Windows 7 Beta at work. I had looked on the Internet but couldn't find a lot of pictures of it or much info, so I'm going to do a little review, for those of you that care.
Probably the first thing you'll notice is the new start menu/window list design. It's much more like Linux (who would have guessed?), and Mac too. One thing I think Windows has done well is the start menu in Vista (and 7), combining a traditional menu design with the functionality of something like Gnome-Do.

Windows 7 adds some capabilities to this design. You can "pin" things from the start menu to the bar, as well as browse more things directly from the menu. I think they call this something like a "jump menu."

You can also browse your windows from the window list. They are grouped together by application. All of your file browsers are grouped, IE windows are grouped (and each tab is viewed separately there), etc. When you go to the icon, you see a box with previews of
the windows that are grouped there.

Putting your mouse over one of them shows you just that window, turning everything else into just a black border, transparent to the desktop. I think this is equally useful and annoying. The close button that each preview has is nice, though.

I like the fact that it's been condensed to a per-icon basis rather than having to fit text down there, but I'm not sure how well it will always work. I know that with Linux it's a problem when a window has no icon, it just uses the default, and having more than one like that may be a problem. Most applications that most people use should be fine, though.
I know that a lot of people have a lot of negative feedback about the new ribbon UI in Office 2007, but I have come to like it. After using AutoCAD 2008, I got used to that kind of interface and preferred using it. Switching from the old-school menus and bars is a big change, but
seriously, deal with it. I like the context-based organization of it, and once you get the hang of it, things are much easier to find than having to dig though long menus at the top.
I do have a reason for this little rant... Paint got a makeover to this new design, and while I think for a program of its caliber it's a bit overkill, I like it. It's good for consistency.

More options have been added for themes, which is awesome. One of the things I disliked the most about Vista was how the interface was so fixed, with really no options to customize it, where Linux has more options that I know what to do with. Windows 7 brings a choice of color for your transparent windows, and, while I prefer the regular bluish anyway, it's still a good addition. The desktop chooser is also very nicely redone, allowing you to choose among a group of pictures that will rotate every so often.
A more subtle change is that when a window is maximized, the title bar no longer turns black, but keeps the theme.
The sidebar for gadgets is gone, and I'm not sure whether that's a good or bad thing. I never really used it, I have Google Desktop under Vista (when I use it, which is less than once a month), but I think it's nice to have the gadgets arranged in a sidebar. In Windows 7 they are freely arranged on the desktop, which you could do in Vista, but at least there was the choice to sidebar them.
I tried YouTube videos in the cascade window switcher (that's what I call it), and they played while being browsed there. They also play in the bar at the bottom. I'm not sure how Vista did with this. I still noticed that if a window was not up it wouldn't update the preview in these places, though.

The system tray is another thing that has had a major redesign. Instead of trying to autohide things in a massive system tray, they get their own icon and popup box.

In the box you can see all of your icons, and when you go to the properties of this box, you have more options. You can decide when an icon should be shown a per-application basis. This is very handy to see only what you want to while hiding the clutter.

Notifications are similar, being grouped together in one icon that expands to a little box of notifications.
Windows has also changed the way that it organizes your personal files (again?). It has a section called "Libraries" which contains your usual Documents, Music, etc.
It's also got the cute updates to the flashy bling stuff you see around, such as the boot screen and others. Subtle things to distinguish it from Vista, which it otherwise resembles very much.
IE 8 Beta. Woo hoo. Looks more like Firefox (good, because I thought the IE 7 interface was bulky and awkward), not too much different.

It does have a different look to the history search, too. It looks more like, you guessed it, Firefox.

One thing that I was sad to see remain is the login screen behavior when part of a domain. When you use the username "administrator," it automatically assumes you want to log on to the machine instead of the domain. This is almost never the case. It's annoying to have to do "domain\administrator" every time to get it to log in to the domain. Maybe it's our fault for using "administrator" as our administrator, but still, it's annoying.
I tried adding an HP LaserJet 1012 and a 1005 (I think) as printers, but neither worked. The 1012 was a pain in Vista, but it eventually could work. I wasn't able to get drivers to install for either one, but that's something I'll excuse for a Beta release of Windows.
Also, it hasn't gotten any smaller. It's installed on a 40 GB drive (really 37.2 GB), and it has only 3 GB free, with only Office, an anti-virus, and Flash Player installed. I seem to recall some MS person saying that Vista got really big, and they just needed to make sure it didn't get any worse.
It may have.
Seriously, what are they doing with all that space? I think Linux does way more in a 2 GB install.
Probably the first thing you'll notice is the new start menu/window list design. It's much more like Linux (who would have guessed?), and Mac too. One thing I think Windows has done well is the start menu in Vista (and 7), combining a traditional menu design with the functionality of something like Gnome-Do.

Windows 7 adds some capabilities to this design. You can "pin" things from the start menu to the bar, as well as browse more things directly from the menu. I think they call this something like a "jump menu."

You can also browse your windows from the window list. They are grouped together by application. All of your file browsers are grouped, IE windows are grouped (and each tab is viewed separately there), etc. When you go to the icon, you see a box with previews of
the windows that are grouped there.

Putting your mouse over one of them shows you just that window, turning everything else into just a black border, transparent to the desktop. I think this is equally useful and annoying. The close button that each preview has is nice, though.

I like the fact that it's been condensed to a per-icon basis rather than having to fit text down there, but I'm not sure how well it will always work. I know that with Linux it's a problem when a window has no icon, it just uses the default, and having more than one like that may be a problem. Most applications that most people use should be fine, though.
I know that a lot of people have a lot of negative feedback about the new ribbon UI in Office 2007, but I have come to like it. After using AutoCAD 2008, I got used to that kind of interface and preferred using it. Switching from the old-school menus and bars is a big change, but
seriously, deal with it. I like the context-based organization of it, and once you get the hang of it, things are much easier to find than having to dig though long menus at the top.
I do have a reason for this little rant... Paint got a makeover to this new design, and while I think for a program of its caliber it's a bit overkill, I like it. It's good for consistency.

More options have been added for themes, which is awesome. One of the things I disliked the most about Vista was how the interface was so fixed, with really no options to customize it, where Linux has more options that I know what to do with. Windows 7 brings a choice of color for your transparent windows, and, while I prefer the regular bluish anyway, it's still a good addition. The desktop chooser is also very nicely redone, allowing you to choose among a group of pictures that will rotate every so often.
A more subtle change is that when a window is maximized, the title bar no longer turns black, but keeps the theme.The sidebar for gadgets is gone, and I'm not sure whether that's a good or bad thing. I never really used it, I have Google Desktop under Vista (when I use it, which is less than once a month), but I think it's nice to have the gadgets arranged in a sidebar. In Windows 7 they are freely arranged on the desktop, which you could do in Vista, but at least there was the choice to sidebar them.
I tried YouTube videos in the cascade window switcher (that's what I call it), and they played while being browsed there. They also play in the bar at the bottom. I'm not sure how Vista did with this. I still noticed that if a window was not up it wouldn't update the preview in these places, though.

The system tray is another thing that has had a major redesign. Instead of trying to autohide things in a massive system tray, they get their own icon and popup box.

In the box you can see all of your icons, and when you go to the properties of this box, you have more options. You can decide when an icon should be shown a per-application basis. This is very handy to see only what you want to while hiding the clutter.

Notifications are similar, being grouped together in one icon that expands to a little box of notifications.
Windows has also changed the way that it organizes your personal files (again?). It has a section called "Libraries" which contains your usual Documents, Music, etc.
It's also got the cute updates to the flashy bling stuff you see around, such as the boot screen and others. Subtle things to distinguish it from Vista, which it otherwise resembles very much.
IE 8 Beta. Woo hoo. Looks more like Firefox (good, because I thought the IE 7 interface was bulky and awkward), not too much different.

It does have a different look to the history search, too. It looks more like, you guessed it, Firefox.

One thing that I was sad to see remain is the login screen behavior when part of a domain. When you use the username "administrator," it automatically assumes you want to log on to the machine instead of the domain. This is almost never the case. It's annoying to have to do "domain\administrator" every time to get it to log in to the domain. Maybe it's our fault for using "administrator" as our administrator, but still, it's annoying.
I tried adding an HP LaserJet 1012 and a 1005 (I think) as printers, but neither worked. The 1012 was a pain in Vista, but it eventually could work. I wasn't able to get drivers to install for either one, but that's something I'll excuse for a Beta release of Windows.
Also, it hasn't gotten any smaller. It's installed on a 40 GB drive (really 37.2 GB), and it has only 3 GB free, with only Office, an anti-virus, and Flash Player installed. I seem to recall some MS person saying that Vista got really big, and they just needed to make sure it didn't get any worse.
It may have.
Seriously, what are they doing with all that space? I think Linux does way more in a 2 GB install.
Labels: post









